Restraint of trade clauses are one of my favourite bugbears. Commonly found in employment agreements. I review a few of these both for employers and employees and most (if not all) would be in part or in full, void, and only seem to exist to scare (ex) employees into not working for the opposition.

Leaving aside the ones that are so bad they were obviously written by the first year HR intern, who in turn got it off the internet, they all seem to have the same flaws.

  • They attempt to stop someone from carrying out their trade or profession either ‘for ever’ or for an inordinate length of time; and / or
  • They attempt to stop someone carrying out their trade or profession ‘in the whole of Australia’ or ‘the whole of Victoria’;
  • They attempt to stop someone working for anyone who ‘may be or is’ a competitor, or ‘who does’ (or may do) the same kind of work;
  • They confuse obligations around misuse of Confidential Information with a restraint of trade.

Restraint of trade clauses are usually void unless ‘they are reasonable in the interest of the parties’(the onus of proof being on the party relying on the restraint).

When assessing reasonableness the courts will first consider whether there is a ‘legitimate interest‘ or interests that ‘require protection’ and, if so, will assess whether or not the restraint does not more than is necessary to protect that interest; if the restraint goes beyond what is necessary, then it will not be considered reasonable and the restraint will fail.

Reasonableness means reasonable as to:

  • Geographical limit (10km may be ok, the whole state probably not);
  • Subject matter of the restraint (what you are restrained from doing;)
  • Time. One year may be unreasonable, three or six months may be fine.

However, mere protection against competition does not constitute a ‘legitimate interest’ and will fail.

So, if you have (as many do) a restraint of trade clause in your employment agreement, get it looked at by a lawyer who understands what is (and is not) an appropriate restraint, or just delete it.

Related Articles

Megs D
Megs D
Google Review
Read More
David was INSTRUMENTAL in helping me launch a new business quickly and properly. He looked at the information I had put together, talked through what I needed and why it was important, and worked with me to get the right solution sorted quickly (unlike the previous company I had been dealing with who dragged things on for weeks and then just tried to sell me what they had rather than listen to/understand what I was after). VERY impressed with the quick turnaround and have no hesitation recommending him to others. Will definitely use his services for future projects.
Arek Rainczuk
Arek Rainczuk
Google Review
Read More
I engaged David to draw up contracts for my agency. He took the time to learn about my specific needs, proposed valuable clauses and delivered in a timely manner. David is very experienced and easy to work with, now I have the peace of mind to focus on what I do best.
Ben Walter
Ben Walter
Google Review
Read More
Dave is always helpful with questions, taking and recommending action. He has a wealth of ASDEFCON experience and a pragmatic approach to dealing with commercial issues.
Previous
Next

Share this page